Posts Tagged ‘5 eh’

Review: Clara Callan

Wright, Richard B.  Clara Callan. HarperPerenniel Modern Classics (2001).

Clara Callan

 It is the late 1930s and two sisters, Clara and Nora Callan, face the future with both hope and uncertainty.  Clara, a thirtyish schoolteacher from small-town Ontario, longs for love and adventure.  Nora, her flighty and very pretty younger sister, escapes to the excitement of New York, where she becomes a monor celbrity.  At a time when war clouds are gathering, the sisters struggle within the web of social expectation for young women…

From the Jacket

Fantastic.  It has been a while since I have been so contented while reading a book.  The storyline is interesting, the prose: lyrical, the pace: great.  All in all, a novel very deserving of the Governor General Award for Literary Fiction. 

The novel is actually a collection of letters and journal entries written between Clara, her sister Nora, and Nora’s friend Evelyn.  At first I was a little skeptical of reading a book that was just letters, but I soon realized that the letters were so interesting and well written you hardly noticed it at all.  There was never any confusion about who was writing the letter (most of it is written by Clara’s hand).

I have talked about perspective before on this blog.  Usually you can tell if the author is male or female and their characters take on that tone.  This was written from the female perspective so well that it wasn’t until the end of the novel I remembered it was written by a man.  The sentiments and feelings are so clearly female.  Also, it’s also hard to believe a man would write all those letters (even if he is the author!).

Themes in this book are relationships, love, sexuality, politics and culture.

I would say this is was definitely worthy of

  • Share/Bookmark

Review: Shakespeare’s Dog Was Exactly That: A Dog

 Rooke, Leon.  Shakespeare’s Dog: A Novel.  Thomas Allen Publishers (2003). Originally published 1981.

 A tour de force of inventive wit “Shakespeare’s Dog” is the eccentric and high-spirited story of William Shakespeare and how he came to bed and wed Anne Hathaway. Told from the point of view of the Bard’s dog, this astonishing novel of comic bliss, hailed as a triumph of language and an amusing delight.

From the Publisher’s Website

I can’t believe that all of the contenders that year, this book was picked as a winner.  Really.  This book is written from Shakespeare’s dog’s perspective.  If this is what my dog is thinking then I am super glad he can’t talk like Hooker does in the book.  Sometimes it seems as if Shakespeare understands him and sometimes he does not.  It really didn’t add anything to the story and it seemed a little contrived.   What totally blows my mind is that this was made into a play.  For the stage.  I mean, what exactly did they make a play about?  A dog sniffing around cursing?  Shakespeare’s imagined conversations with his canine companion?  I have a feeling this play would be worse than the slow death I experienced at Death of a Salesman (and I’m not talking about the main character).

I feel like I can now curse out someone quite thoroughly in a Shakespearean way and I know about 15 different words for vagina.  Educational?  Maybe.  Practical?  No, well…maybe.  I really just could not get into this book.  It took me a few tries to get past the first chapter and once I had I wondered why I even bothered?  I mean, this is something I would expect the Giller Prize committee to have commended (oooh snap!)  not the Governor General Award committee.  Perhaps it was just a really bad year for literature.  I don’t know. 

Not worth the time, I can’t even pick out a theme really.  Perhaps survival and relationships.  I never thought I would ever be giving out this score, but this book really did sucketh.

I read this novel towards my personal Governor General Award Winner for Fiction Challenge.

  • Share/Bookmark

Religious Freedom is Our Right, But Is It Everyone’s? (II)

Go here to see Part One.

I liked this novel because I felt it did an incredible job showing how every single person is affected by the war.  Whether they are working in the mine, a government official, a doctor, or a villager, every aspect of every one’s life is drastically altered.  Doctors are stretched to the breaking point and on drugs themselves in order to keep up with the casualties and bodies coming through their door.  They would send their interns/volunteers for supplies and not really care where they got them from.  A lot of looting in nearby villages was by the hospital staff to get their hands on anything that would help save lives.  Makeshift operating rooms were springing up around the country and doctors were kidnapped by all sides to operate on their fallen brothers.  Anil faces this reality when she goes with Sarath to see his brother, a doctor in an emergency room. 

No one trusts any one else.  Families brake apart with distrust and a need for individual preservation.  There really is a feeling of every man for himself.  Anil does not trust Sarath, and it is not clear until the end who he is working for and where his allegiance lies.  In the meantime Anil is having difficulty relating to her surroundings.  Although she grew up there, she sees England and the United States as her home.  Perhaps because they were her salvation.  She left this war torn country and was introduced to bowling, lovers, friends, movies…all the things that we take for granted as Canadians and Americans.  It is important that she begins to identify with Sri Lanka because she is treating the situation without the respect it deserves.  She forgets how things work and is dangerously close to getting herself into trouble.  If it weren’t for Sarath, she would have said something that would have got her killed a long time ago.

Anil tries to use modern techniques to reconstruct the skeleton’s face and body, but is finds it is difficult because she doesn’t have access to the appropriate equipment.  She is frustrated that she has to work with minimal tools and constantly on the move, but remains determined to do her job.  I think this represents the struggle between western ideals and the realities facing Sri Lankans.  How do you fight against a war that has no rules?  Neither the government nor the insurgents follow any kind of rules and the reasons for the war are so complex that for an outsider to step in and try to apply all of these rules and regulations is nearly impossible.  They go largely ignored.

Anil’s Ghost  does deal with religious freedoms.  In each ward of the hospital there are Buddha shrines that are lit up.  Buddha’s are also erected all over the country-side, and Anil and Sarath go to visit a legendary anthropologist who has removed himself from society and is living in a forest grove formerly occupied by monks.  At one point a Buddha in the country-side is looted and destroyed, not for religious purposes, but for money rumored to be inside.  It is very representative of the Sri Lankan people who are in this war not because they want to be, but because the war affects everyone without prejudice.  The original reasons for the war are being forgotten by the people as they are destroyed and torn apart, and the people begin to focus solely on their survival. 

Anil and Sarath approach a man once renowned for painting the eyes on Buddhas to help them reconstruct the face of the skeleton they are trying to identify.  Instead of reconstructing the face as it was, he reconstructs it with a peacefulness he wishes for his wife who passed away.  Anil believes no one will recognize it because of the feeling of serenity, a feeling that has not existed since the before the war.

When reading more about this novel, I came across a very interesting point on Wikipedia.  “Religious statues in Anil’s Ghost are representative of the Sri Lankan people’s struggle during the war.  Buddha’s eyes and “sight” were important. Similarly, so long as Sri Lankans and westerners alike do not open their eyes and acknowledge the war and take a stand against the violations of human rights there will be no progress. There will be nothing. No name for victims, no identification of the enemy. The destruction will continue and human existence will be hindered.” (Anil’s Ghost).  There is a central credo in the psychiatric community which states “You cannot help someone who does not want to be helped,” and I think that definitely applies here.  Without acknowledging the problem, it is like it doesn’t exist.  Instead it festers beneath the surface and explodes into consciousness in the most brutal of ways.  It is everyone’s responsibility to raise awareness and to provide assistance, but without that first acceptance by the Sri Lankan government, that will never happen.

I can’t imagine not having the right to religious freedom.  I cannot imagine living in a country that is so torn apart, where love is something that hardly exists anymore and those you do love are taken so brutally from you.  I’m glad that MPW comes home and complains about the traffic and broken computers and not about the bomb that went off in the market killing his friends, or more horribly, not coming home at all.  Having religious freedom means I don’t have to fight for it like those before me and those in other countries are doing now.  Having religious freedom means I don’t have to live through atrocities that I only read about in books.

I’m giving this book 5 eh’s for being so thought provoking. 

 

What does religious freedom mean to you?

  • Share/Bookmark